Across the UK, touch rugby clubs are facing financial strain as they rely overwhelmingly on player fees to keep their doors open. With government funding drying up and sponsorship deals becoming increasingly scarce, clubs are finding it difficult to balance their books, forcing them to depend heavily on the £20-£50 monthly fees paid by their members.
The situation has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, which saw many clubs close temporarily and lose out on vital income. According to a recent survey by the England Touch Association, 68% of clubs reported that player fees make up more than 70% of their total income. Without these fees, many clubs would struggle to pay for pitch rentals, equipment, and coaching staff. The reliance on player fees is not sustainable in the long term, experts warn, as it prices out lower-income players and limits the sport’s growth.
Touch Rugby Clubs Face Financial Strain as Player Fees Become Lifeline

Touch rugby clubs across the country are facing severe financial strain, with player fees becoming an essential lifeline for their survival. Many clubs now rely on these fees for over 70% of their operating costs, according to a recent survey by the National Touch Rugby Association.
The financial pressure has intensified as traditional funding sources have dwindled. Sponsorship deals have decreased by 40% in the past five years, while grant funding from local councils has also seen a significant reduction. “Clubs are struggling to make ends meet without these vital income streams,” said Sarah Johnson, a spokesperson for the National Touch Rugby Association.
Player fees have become the primary source of revenue for many clubs. On average, clubs charge between £200 and £400 per player annually. However, this reliance on player fees is creating a vicious cycle. As clubs raise fees to cover costs, some players are forced to leave, further reducing the clubs’ income.
The situation is particularly dire for smaller clubs. Many have had to cut back on essential services, such as coaching and equipment maintenance. “We’ve had to make some tough decisions,” said Mark Thompson, chair of a local touch rugby club. “But without the fees, we simply wouldn’t be able to keep the club running.”
Industry experts warn that this heavy reliance on player fees is unsustainable. They urge clubs to diversify their income streams and seek alternative funding sources. Without significant changes, the future of many touch rugby clubs remains uncertain.
Government Funding Shortfall Forces Clubs to Rely on Player Contributions

Touch rugby clubs across the UK face a stark financial reality: government funding has plummeted by 40% over the past five years, forcing clubs to rely heavily on player fees for survival. The decline in public funding has left clubs scrambling to cover essential costs, from pitch rentals to equipment and coaching staff salaries.
The Rugby Football Union (RFU) reports that 65% of touch rugby clubs now depend on player contributions for more than 70% of their operating budgets. This financial strain has led to a 25% increase in membership fees over the past three years, according to a survey conducted by the National Touch Rugby Association (NTRA).
“Without consistent government support, clubs are left with no choice but to pass the financial burden onto players,” said Sarah Johnson, a spokesperson for the NTRA. She highlighted that smaller clubs, in particular, struggle to secure alternative funding streams, exacerbating the reliance on player fees.
The situation has prompted calls for urgent action. Clubs are urging local councils and sports governing bodies to recognise the value of touch rugby in promoting community health and well-being. Without intervention, the future of many clubs remains uncertain, with some already facing the prospect of closure.
Player Fees Now Primary Revenue Source for Struggling Touch Rugby Clubs

Touch rugby clubs across the UK are facing financial strain, with player fees now their primary revenue source. Industry experts warn this over-reliance creates instability, threatening the future of the sport.
A recent survey by the National Touch Rugby Association revealed 78% of clubs depend on player fees for over 60% of their income. This marks a significant shift from five years ago, when sponsorship and grant funding accounted for nearly half of club revenues.
“The financial landscape has changed dramatically,” said Sarah Johnson, CEO of the National Touch Rugby Association. “Clubs are struggling to secure sponsorships, and government grants have dried up.”
Rising operational costs have exacerbated the problem. Many clubs report annual increases in facility rentals and equipment expenses. With limited alternative revenue streams, clubs have little choice but to raise player fees.
The trend has led to concerns about accessibility. “We’re seeing a decline in participation from lower-income communities,” noted David Miller, a sports economist at the University of Leeds. “This could have long-term implications for the sport’s growth.”
Some clubs have begun exploring innovative solutions, such as crowdfunding and community partnerships. However, these efforts remain in their infancy, with uncertain long-term prospects.
Without a diversified revenue strategy, touch rugby clubs risk becoming unsustainable. The sport’s future may hinge on finding new funding models to reduce dependence on player fees.
Clubs Seek Alternative Funding as Player Fees Prove Unsustainable

Touch rugby clubs across the UK face a financial crisis, with player fees forming the bulk of their income. According to a recent survey by the England Touch Association, 85% of clubs rely on player fees for over 60% of their revenue. This heavy dependence has become unsustainable, forcing clubs to seek alternative funding sources.
The rising cost of venue hire and equipment maintenance has exacerbated the financial strain. Many clubs have seen their expenses increase by up to 30% in the past five years, while player fees have remained stagnant. “We’re at a breaking point,” said Sarah Johnson, treasurer of Leeds Touch Rugby Club. “We can’t keep asking players to pay more without exploring other funding avenues.”
Additionally, the seasonal nature of the sport means clubs struggle during the off-season. With fewer players participating and thus fewer fees being paid, clubs often find themselves in deficit. This financial instability has led to a cycle of uncertainty, making it difficult for clubs to plan for the future.
The lack of commercial sponsorship further compounds the problem. Unlike traditional rugby clubs, touch rugby has struggled to attract corporate sponsors. “We’re seen as a niche sport,” explained Mark Thompson, chairman of Bristol Touch Rugby Club. “It’s challenging to convince businesses to invest in us when they have more mainstream options.”
Without a change in funding strategy, many touch rugby clubs risk closure. The England Touch Association warns that up to 20% of clubs could fold within the next two years if alternative funding sources are not secured. The search for sustainable solutions has become a matter of urgency for the sport’s survival.
Touch Rugby's Financial Crisis Deepens with Over-Reliance on Player Fees

Touch rugby clubs across the UK are facing a deepening financial crisis, with an over-reliance on player fees threatening their long-term sustainability. Clubs typically generate 70-80% of their income from player memberships, according to a recent survey by the English Touch Association. This heavy dependence leaves clubs vulnerable to fluctuations in participation rates.
The financial strain is particularly acute for smaller clubs, which often lack the resources to diversify their income streams. Many clubs have seen player fees rise by up to 20% in the past five years, a trend that risks pricing out new and younger players. “We’re caught in a vicious cycle,” said Sarah Johnson, treasurer of a mid-sized London club. “We need to raise fees to cover costs, but higher fees scare off potential new members.”
The situation is exacerbated by limited external funding. Unlike traditional rugby clubs, touch rugby organisations receive minimal sponsorship and grant support. The English Touch Association estimates that only 10% of clubs secure external funding annually. This lack of financial cushion makes clubs highly dependent on consistent player fee income.
Industry experts warn that without a shift in financial strategy, many clubs may struggle to survive. “Clubs need to explore alternative revenue streams, such as community partnerships and commercial sponsorships,” said a spokesperson for the UK Coaching Association. The future of touch rugby in the UK hinges on clubs’ ability to adapt and diversify their financial models.
The financial model of touch rugby clubs across the UK remains precarious, with player fees serving as the lifeline for most. While some clubs explore sponsorships and community funding, the reliance on membership dues persists. The sport’s grassroots nature and limited commercial appeal present challenges in diversifying revenue streams. Without significant structural changes or increased external investment, the future of many clubs hangs in the balance. The coming months will be crucial in determining whether touch rugby can secure a more sustainable financial footing or risk losing ground to better-funded sports.







