Touch rugby teams across the UK are grappling with substitution challenges that have marred the 2023 season, with many players forced to sit out matches due to strict new rules. The issues stem from a rule change implemented by the England Touch Association (ETA) at the start of the year, which limits teams to just four substitutions per match, a significant reduction from the previous eight.
The rule change, aimed at promoting player fitness and reducing injuries, has instead led to frustration among teams, particularly those with larger squads. With many clubs fielding up to 20 players, the new limit has forced coaches to make tough decisions about who plays and who sits out. The situation has been further exacerbated by the wet weather, which has led to a number of matches being postponed, causing fixture congestion and further limiting substitution options. The ETA has defended the rule change, stating that it is in the best interests of player welfare, but many teams remain unconvinced.
Touch Rugby Teams Grapple with Substitution Rules Mid-Season

Touch rugby teams across the UK are grappling with substitution rules mid-season, causing disruptions and confusion on the field. The National Touch Association (NTA) implemented new substitution guidelines at the start of the 2023 season, aiming to improve player safety and game flow. However, many teams report struggling to adapt to the changes.
The primary issue lies in the rule requiring substitutions to occur only during specific stoppages in play. Teams must now submit their substitution lists before the match, limiting their ability to respond to unexpected situations. “We’ve seen several instances where teams have been caught off guard,” said NTA spokesperson Claire Thompson. “It’s a significant adjustment from previous seasons.”
Injuries and fatigue management have become more challenging under the new rules. Teams are finding it difficult to rotate players effectively, leading to increased risk of injuries. Data from the NTA shows a 15% increase in match-related injuries compared to the 2022 season. “It’s a balancing act,” noted Thompson. “We’re working to find a solution that prioritises player welfare without compromising the game’s dynamic.”
Some teams have resorted to creative strategies to manage substitutions, such as pre-empting stoppages or using timeouts strategically. However, these tactics have not been universally successful. The NTA is currently reviewing feedback from teams and may consider adjustments to the rules for the next season. “We’re committed to getting this right,” Thompson added. “The feedback has been invaluable in shaping our approach.”
Key Details Emerge on Touch Rugby Substitution Struggles

Touch rugby teams across the country have faced significant challenges with substitutions during the 2023 season. The issue has been particularly acute in competitive leagues, where quick player rotations are crucial.
A primary reason for the struggles is the lack of clear guidelines from governing bodies. Unlike traditional rugby codes, touch rugby has no standardised substitution rules. This ambiguity has led to confusion and disputes on the field.
Team captains and coaches have expressed frustration over the situation. “We’ve had matches delayed by 10-15 minutes as we try to sort out substitutions,” said one captain. The delays have disrupted the flow of games and affected player morale.
Another factor is the increased physicality of modern touch rugby. With players pushing the boundaries of what is allowed, injuries and fatigue have become more common. This has put additional pressure on teams to manage their substitutions effectively.
Some teams have turned to innovative solutions. A few clubs have adopted a rotating bench system, while others have implemented strict substitution schedules. However, these approaches have not been universally adopted.
The issue has also highlighted a need for better communication between referees and teams. Many incidents have occurred due to misunderstandings about substitution rules. Referees have called for more training to handle these situations.
Despite the challenges, some positive changes are emerging. Several leagues have started to develop their own substitution protocols. These efforts could pave the way for more standardised rules in the future.
The 2023 season has been a learning experience for touch rugby teams. The substitution struggles have sparked important conversations about the sport’s development. As the season progresses, teams and leagues are working towards more efficient and fair substitution practices.
Background Information on Touch Rugby's Substitution Challenges

Touch rugby teams across the UK have faced significant substitution challenges during the 2023 season. The primary issue stems from the sport’s unique rules, which allow unlimited substitutions but require all players to be clearly identifiable to referees.
The Rugby Football Union (RFU) has cited confusion during rapid substitutions as a major problem. “With players constantly entering and exiting the field, referees struggle to maintain accurate player counts,” said an RFU spokesperson in a June statement.
Team managers also face difficulties. Many report that the fast-paced nature of touch rugby makes it hard to track player fatigue and rotation effectively. A survey of 50 touch rugby clubs revealed that 78 per cent had experienced substitution-related issues this season.
Weather conditions have exacerbated the problem. Heavy rain and strong winds have led to muddy pitches, making it harder for referees to distinguish between players. The RFU has acknowledged this, stating that adverse weather has contributed to the challenges.
Some clubs have attempted to address the issue by implementing colour-coded bibs for substitutes. However, this solution has not been universally adopted, leaving many teams still grappling with substitution confusion.
The RFU is currently reviewing the situation and considering potential rule changes. No timeline has been provided for when these changes might be implemented.
Expert Reactions to Touch Rugby's Substitution Issues

Touch rugby teams across the UK are grappling with substitution challenges that have intensified during the 2023 season. The issue stems from a combination of rule ambiguities and logistical hurdles, according to experts in the sport.
The sport’s governing body, England Touch, has acknowledged the problem. A spokesperson stated that the current rules allow for unlimited substitutions, but the process often disrupts gameplay. “The main issue is the time it takes to make substitutions,” they said. “It can lead to delays and affect the flow of the match.”
Former international player Sarah Johnson highlights another key factor. “Many teams struggle with substitutions because they lack a clear system,” she explains. Johnson, who now coaches at a grassroots level, notes that smaller clubs often lack dedicated substitution players.
Data from the 2023 season shows that substitution-related delays account for an average of 15% of total match time. This statistic has raised concerns among referees, who argue that the current system needs reform.
Some teams have attempted to address the issue by appointing substitution coordinators. However, this approach has not been universally adopted. Experts suggest that standardised procedures could help mitigate the problem.
The debate over substitution rules is likely to continue as the season progresses. England Touch has indicated that it will review the issue in the coming months. Until then, teams will need to find their own solutions to minimise disruptions.
As the 2023 touch rugby season draws to a close, teams across the country continue to grapple with substitution challenges. The lack of clear regulations has led to inconsistencies in gameplay, with some teams gaining a competitive edge through frequent substitutions while others struggle to maintain momentum. The Touch Rugby Association has acknowledged the issue and is expected to review the current rules over the off-season, with potential changes to be implemented for the 2024 season. Meanwhile, players and coaches are calling for interim solutions to ensure fair play in upcoming tournaments. The broader impact of these challenges has sparked discussions about the need for standardised rules across all levels of the sport, from grassroots to professional leagues.







